Archive

Archive for the ‘.NET’ Category

Handle all uncaught exceptions thrown when using Task Parallel Library (take 2)

May 7th, 2010 Buu Nguyen No comments

A couple of days ago I posted a solution to handle all uncaught exceptions when using TPL. I’ve found a better way to do that, making use of task continuation. The class ThreadFactory below exposes the Error event which can be subscribed by a top-level handler and provides methods to start a task attached with proper continuation.

internal class ThreadFactory
{
    public delegate void TaskError(Task task, Exception error);

    public static readonly ThreadFactory Instance = new ThreadFactory();

    private ThreadFactory() {}

    public event TaskError Error;

    public void InvokeError(Task task, Exception error)
    {
        TaskError handler = Error;
        if (handler != null) handler(task, error);
    }

    public void Start(Action action)
    {
        var task = new Task(action);
        Start(task);
    }

    public void Start(Action action, TaskCreationOptions options)
    {
        var task = new Task(action, options);
        Start(task);
    }

    private void Start(Task task)
    {
        task.ContinueWith(t => InvokeError(t, t.Exception.InnerException),
                            TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnFaulted |
                            TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously);
        task.Start();
    }
}
  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: .NET Tags: , , , ,

Speaking at the Visual Studio.NET 2010 Launch in Hanoi

April 19th, 2010 Buu Nguyen 6 comments

Last Tuesday, I spoke at the Visual Studio.NET 2010 launch in Hanoi. It was a big launch with about 400 attendees. I hosted 2 sessions, one about ASP.NET 4.0 (including web forms, MVC, AJAX and dynamic data) and another about C# 4.0 and PLINQ. On the following day, I spoke at Microsoft Vietnam’s office about building scalable .NET web applications to about 40 .NET architects and developers in Hanoi.

In general, it was a great trip to Hanoi and I had a lot of fun speaking and meeting many people there. The sessions by other speakers were really great. I was particular impressed with what Silverlight 4.0 and SharePoint 2010 had to offer.

You can find the slides and sample code I used for these sessions below.

Sample code can be downloaded here

Some pictures taken (click to view larger images)

VS.NET 2010 Launch Event

Tea Break during the VS.NET 2010 Launch

.NET Web Scalability Presentation at Microsoft Vietnam's Office

Tea Break during the Scalability Presentation

  • Share/Bookmark

I’m a Microsoft MVP!

April 2nd, 2010 Buu Nguyen 12 comments

An email from Microsoft, starting with “Congratulations! We are pleased to present you with the 2010 Microsoft® MVP Award! This award is given to exceptional technical community leaders who actively share their high quality, real world expertise with others. We appreciate your outstanding contributions in ASP/ASP.NET technical communities during the past year.” has made my day.

It’s official, I am a Microsoft MVP! (Click here to see my profile.) One can’t help feeling honored knowing that he is one of the selected 4,000 in 100 million technical community participants worldwide and among the 12 MVPs in Vietnam. I am honored.

My sincere thanks to the employees at Microsoft who nominated and joined me in many community projects during the past year! I truly enjoy working with you and I am looking forwards to future projects.

MVP-h-550x222

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: .NET Tags: , ,

ASP.NET MVC Validation Library 1.3 Release

March 31st, 2010 Buu Nguyen No comments

This is truly a month of release. In fact, I released Fasterflect 2.0 and Combres 2.0 within the past 10 days. And now, it’s ASP.NET MVC Validation Library 1.3. It’s not like I suddenly have all the time in the world to push the releases of these libraries. Instead, code gets accumulated over the last 3-4 months until they happen to be done at the same time. Anyway, a couple of notes about this release of ASP.NET MVC Validation Library.

First and foremost, if you are using ASP.NET MVC 2.0, then you can stop reading. This library is not for you. Really, ASP.NET MVC 2.0 comes with a highly robust and flexible validation functionality built-in already, so there’s no reason to look for a 3rd-party library which has nothing more to offer. That said, if you are still stuck with some ASP.NET MVC 1.0 legacy apps, like me, then my library can be useful.

If you are not familiar with this library, please refer to this originally introductory post to learn how to use it. Because I haven’t taken the time to posted about the all of changes since the release mentioned in that post, I’m doing it now.

Changes in 1.3

  • Support custom server-side validation
  • Support remote validation (integrated with jQuery Validate’s remote method)
  • The design of validation attributes is improved to make addition of new validation attribute much more intuitive

Changes in 1.2

  • Support RegularExpressionValidatorAttribute (use the property ClientFunctionName to specify the corresponding jQuery Validate’s function)
  • Allow specify a custom form validation function (i.e. instead of the default $(formName).validate())
  • Support PropertyComparisonValidatorAttribute (equal operator only)
  • EntityValidationException adds constructor to accept custom key-value pair (i.e. useful for non-model/custom validations)
  • Support specifying custom ready function (i.e. useful when using a 3rd-party script loader, like Google’s, to load jQuery)
  • Support specifying custom client ID (in case the client-side ID is different from the client-side name (used for posted value)

Changes in 1.1

  • Eliminate the need to specify type parameter when invoking Validate() method
  • Allow users to specify prefix when populating model state with error messages

That’s it for the post. That’s it? Yes, that’s it. The library is ridiculously easy to use, so you don’t need another 10 pages of tutorial here. Instead, the old introductory article, together with the above change notices, should be enough for you to start working with the library. Okay, it might not be that easy. Don’t worry yet, the download of ASP.NET MVC Validation Library comes with CHM API documentation and a sample application that uses almost all features of the library. So, download and explore the library yourself. And post here if you have any comment or feedback. Enjoy!

  • Share/Bookmark

Combres 2.0 Release

March 30th, 2010 Buu Nguyen 2 comments

After a couple of months working on and off on this project, I was finally able to release the next major version of Combres, a .NET library which automates the application of many website optimization techniques in ASP.NET MVC or ASP.NET Web Forms applications.

Access to this CodePlex page to download Combres 2.0, together with source code, CHM API documentation, sample applications and config files.

For a full introduction to Combres 2.0, refer to this Code Project article.

Enjoy the improved performance!

  • Share/Bookmark

Fasterflect 2.0 Release

March 21st, 2010 Buu Nguyen 4 comments

I am pleased to announce the release of Fasterflect 2.0. For those who are not aware of Fasterflect, it is a library that helps you get rid of the complexity and slow performance of .NET Reflection. Check out this Code Project article and a previous announcement for an introduction.

Fasterflect 2.0 comes with a great number of additions & changes, which are possible thanks to the fact that I am no longer the only developer of this project; instead, Morten Mertner (author of Gentle.NET) has joined me since the beginning of 2.0 and made huge contribution ever since. Let’s look at some highlights of this release.

The most exciting addition in this release is that Fasterflect now includes a Query API. Previously you can only use Fasterflect to construct objects or performs invocations (these 2 usages are now referred as Access API). With this release, you can query .NET reflection metadata with Fasterflect although much simpler than what you have to do with the built-in .NET reflection. You can even do more thing with this Query API than you can with .NET reflection out of the box. For example, you can choose to exclude backing members from a lookup or enable partial-name lookup. All you need to do in order to have these level of control is specifying a proper Fasterflect binding flag. The nice thing about Fasterflect binding flag is that it is also fully supported in the Access API.

Next, the Access API is now fully integrated with .NET reflection metadata classes, such as ConstructorInfo, MethodInfo, FieldInfo etc. This integration makes it able for you to mix & match the usages of Query API and Access API as well as allows you to use .NET reflection as it is while delegating the invocation to the fast CIL-generation engine of Fasterflect.

We have also built on top of the core Fasterflect engine some add-on services such as advanced object construction, deep cloning and object mapping. We expect to have more of these services in future releases and of course, you can send us your contributions too.

Users of previous versions of Fasterflect should be aware of the following breaking changes.

  • Many existing extension methods have their names changed as we went through the process of improving API’s consistency & usability. We hope these changes are for the better because now we have 2 developers vote on the conventions instead of 1 like previously :-) . You would have to make some code change when switching from 1.1 to 2.0, but the changes should be very straight-forward in most cases except for the other changes described below.
  • Fasterflect extension methods now don’t require a type parameter, which we have found to be inconvenient because people are forced to append <object> to the call even when they don’t care about the return value or its type. These methods now simply return result of type System.Object and you can cast to the correct type if you need to.
  • Batch fields/properties setting are gone. They are replaced by the object mapping add-on service which is more flexible, sophisticated and faster (CIL code generation is used behind the scene). Batch setting of static members is not supposed though because we think it’s not a common scenario. That said, do let us know if you have this need and we will add support for it in the next minor release.
  • The class Reflector and its methods are now gone. We instead employ a custom-built weak reference-based cache to assure that generated CIL can be garbage-collected when memory is low.

Last but not least, the project wiki on CodePlex is fully populated with comprehensive documentation. While Fasterflect is still ridiculously easy to use, it now has a much bigger API and is more sophisticated than it used to be (e.g. with Fasterflect binding flags). Therefore, documentation should be of great help for those who want to understand everything about Fasterflect to use it effectively in even advanced scenarios without having to dig through the source code.

You can download the binary, source code and CHM API help file in the Fasterflect 2.0 release page in CodePlex. If you want to explore Fasterflect in details, surf through the project wiki. If you just want to jump right into the usages without any further introduction, check out the 2-minute-guide to Access API and this page about the Query API. Finally, the comprehensive unit test suite included in the code download can also serve as good reference for the API.

  • Share/Bookmark

Fasterflect vs. C# 4.0 Dynamic

December 31st, 2009 Buu Nguyen 4 comments

As .NET 4.0 final release will hit the market pretty soon, it’s worth discussing the value of Fasterflect in the face of C# 4.0’s dynamic keyword.  (If you aren’t familiar with C# 4.0 dynamic, you should read my article on C# 4.0 before continuing.)

To recall, Fasterflect was designed to address 2 key disadvantages of .NET Reflection: ease of use and performance.  As seen in my article about C# 4.0, the dynamic keyword nicely addresses the easy of use with a resulting syntax looking even nicer than Fasterflect.  How about performance?

I improved the benchmark application of Fasterflect to add some benchmark code comparing between the performance of C# 4.0 dynamic and Fasterflect.  Here is result of method invocation benchmark.

fasterflectbenchmark

While performing slower than Fasterflect’s cached API, C# dynamic performs much better than Fasterflect’s standard API.  (Not surprisingly, the C# dynamic binding doesn’t resort to the slow reflection mechanism internally.)

With this awareness in mind, together with the understanding about the features of C# dynamic and Fasterflect, let’s discuss about areas where Fasterflect shines even in the face of C# 4.0 dynamic:

  • C# dynamic doesn’t handle invocations performed based on dynamic information (i.e. field name read from XML file).
  • C# dynamic does handle certain types of dynamic invocations, including static method invocation, static property invocation and constructor invocation.
  • C# dynamic doesn’t handle non-public members.  So you’ll receive exception if trying to, say, invoke a private method.
  • When performance is more critical than readability then the Fasterflect’s cached API might be favored over C# dynamic.

Granted, there should be workarounds for the first 3 items.  For example, if you want to invoke static method dynamically with C# dynamic, you would have to workaround like the approach described in this article.  However, the approach uses reflection behind the scene so you would have the same performance issue to start with.

This doesn’t say that Fasterflect is better than C# dynamic though.  While both share a couple of features and maybe used interchangeably in some scenarios, they also have different problems of their own to address.  There are many things that you can do with C# dynamic that you couldn’t do with Fasterflect, e.g. implementing an interceptor to dynamically handle all method invocations (or missing methods) etc.  So, pick the right tool for your problem at hand.

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories: .NET Tags: , , , ,

.NET Reflection Made Fast & Simple – Fasterflect 1.1 Release

November 19th, 2009 Buu Nguyen 7 comments

I’m pleased to announce that version 1.1 of Fasterflect, the fast & simple .NET reflection invocation library, is already released in CodePlex. The download include Fasterflect binary, code documentation, benchmark application source, sample code, unit test source (95%+ coverage, can be used to learn about all usage aspect of Fasterflect).

For an introduction to Fasterflect, including its design, APIs, and benchmark, please refer to this Code Project article.

Changes since version 1.0 beta (the one documented in the Code Project article) include:

  • Support array types (construction, set element, get element)
  • Support structs
  • Support ref/out parameters
  • Support lookup by covariant parameter type
  • Inference of parameter types for non-null arguments
  • Several bug fixes

Sample Code

class PersonClass
{
    private int id;
    private int milesTraveled;
    public int Id
    {
        get { return id; }
        set { id = value; }
    }
    public string Name { get; private set; }
    private static int InstanceCount;

    public PersonClass() : this(0) {}

    public PersonClass(int id) : this(id, string.Empty) { }

    public PersonClass(int id, string name)
    {
        Id = id;
        Name = name;
        InstanceCount++;
    }

    public char this[int index]
    {
        get { return Name[index]; }
    }

    private void Walk(int miles)
    {
        milesTraveled += miles;
    }

    private static void IncreaseInstanceCount()
    {
        InstanceCount++;
    }

    private static int GetInstanceCount()
    {
        return InstanceCount;
    }

    public static void Swap(ref int i, ref int j)
    {
        int tmp = i;
        i = j;
        j = tmp;
    }
}
struct PersonStruct
{
    private int id;
    private int milesTraveled;
    public int Id
    {
        get { return id; }
        set { id = value; }
    }
    public string Name { get; private set; }
    private static int InstanceCount;

    public PersonStruct(int id) : this(id, string.Empty) { }

    public PersonStruct(int id, string name) : this()
    {
        Id = id;
        Name = name;
        InstanceCount++;
    }

    public char this[int index]
    {
        get { return Name[index]; }
    }

    private void Walk(int miles)
    {
        milesTraveled += miles;
    }

    private static void IncreaseInstanceCount()
    {
        InstanceCount++;
    }

    private static int GetInstanceCount()
    {
        return InstanceCount;
    }

    public static void Swap(ref int i, ref int j)
    {
        int tmp = i;
        i = j;
        j = tmp;
    }
}
class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        // Load a type reflectively, just to look like real-life scenario
        var types = new[]
                        {
                            Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetType("FasterflectSample.PersonClass"),
                            Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetType("FasterflectSample.PersonStruct")
                        };
        Array.ForEach(types, type =>
                                 {
                                     ExecuteNormalApi(type);
                                     ExecuteCacheApi(type);
                                 });
    }

    private static void ExecuteNormalApi(Type type)
    {
        bool isStruct = type.IsValueType;

        // Person.InstanceCount should be 0 since no instance is created yet
        AssertTrue(type.GetField<int>("InstanceCount") == 0);

        // Invokes the no-arg constructor
        object obj = type.Construct();

        // Double-check if the constructor is invoked successfully or not
        AssertTrue(null != obj);

        // struct's no-arg constructor cannot be overriden, thus the following checking
        // is not applicable to struct type
        if (!isStruct)
        {
            // Now, Person.InstanceCount should be 1
            AssertTrue(1 == type.GetField<int>("InstanceCount"));

            // What if we don't know the type of InstanceCount?
            // Just specify object as the type parameter
            AssertTrue(type.GetField<object>("InstanceCount") != null);
        }

        // We can bypass the constructor to change the value of Person.InstanceCount
        type.SetField("InstanceCount", 2);
        AssertTrue(2 == type.GetField<int>("InstanceCount"));

        // Let's invoke Person.IncreaseCounter() static method to increase the counter
        // In fact, let's chain the calls to increase 2 times
        type.Invoke("IncreaseInstanceCount")
            .Invoke("IncreaseInstanceCount");
        AssertTrue(4 == type.GetField<int>("InstanceCount"));

        // Now, let's retrieve Person.InstanceCount via the static method GetInstanceCount
        AssertTrue(4 == type.Invoke<int>("GetInstanceCount"));

        // If we're not interested in the return (e.g. only in the side effect),
        // we don't have to specify the type parameter (and can chain the result).
        AssertTrue(4 == type.Invoke("GetInstanceCount")
                            .Invoke("GetInstanceCount")
                            .Invoke<int>("GetInstanceCount"));

        // Invoke method receiving ref/out params, we need to put arguments in an array
        var arguments = new object[] { 1, 2 };
        type.Invoke("Swap",
            // Parameter types must be set to the appropriate ref type
            new[] { typeof(int).MakeByRefType(), typeof(int).MakeByRefType() },
            arguments);
        AssertTrue(2 == (int)arguments[0]);
        AssertTrue(1 == (int)arguments[1]);

        // Now, invoke the 2-arg constructor.  We don't even have to specify parameter types
        // if we know that the arguments are not null (Fasterflect will internally retrieve type info).
        obj = type.Construct(1, "Doe");

        // Due to struct type's pass-by-value nature, in order for struct to be used
        // properly with Fasterflect, you need to convert it into a holder (wrapper) first.
        // The call below does nothing if obj is reference type so when unsure, just call it.
        obj = obj.CreateHolderIfValueType();

        // id and name should have been set properly
        AssertTrue(1 == obj.GetField<int>("id"));
        AssertTrue("Doe" == obj.GetProperty<string>("Name"));

        // Let's use the indexer to retrieve the character at index 1
        AssertTrue('o' == obj.GetIndexer<char>(1));

        // If there's null argument, or when we're unsure whether there's a null argument
        // we must explicitly specify the param type array
        obj = type.Construct(new[] { typeof(int), typeof(string) }, new object[] { 1, null })
            .CreateHolderIfValueType();

        // id and name should have been set properly
        AssertTrue(1 == obj.GetField<int>("id"));
        AssertTrue(null == obj.GetProperty<string>("Name"));

        // Now, modify the id
        obj.SetField("id", 2);
        AssertTrue(2 == obj.GetField<int>("id"));
        AssertTrue(2 == obj.GetProperty<int>("Id"));

        // We can chain calls
        obj.SetField("id", 3).SetProperty("Name", "Buu");
        AssertTrue(3 == obj.GetProperty<int>("Id"));
        AssertTrue("Buu" == obj.GetProperty<string>("Name"));

        // How about modifying both properties at the same time using an anonymous sample
        obj.SetProperties(new {
                                  Id = 4,
                                  Name = "Nguyen"
                              });
        AssertTrue(4 == obj.GetProperty<int>("Id"));
        AssertTrue("Nguyen" == obj.GetProperty<string>("Name"));

        // Let's have the folk walk 6 miles (and try chaining again)
        obj.Invoke("Walk", 1).Invoke("Walk", 2).Invoke("Walk", 3);

        // Double-check the current value of the milesTravelled field
        AssertTrue(6 == obj.GetField<int>("milesTraveled"));

        // Construct an array of 10 elements for current type
        var arr = type.MakeArrayType().Construct(10);

        // Get & set element of array
        obj = type.Construct();
        arr.SetElement(4, obj).SetElement(9, obj);

        if (isStruct) // struct, won't have same reference
        {
            AssertTrue(obj.Equals(arr.GetElement<object>(4)));
            AssertTrue(obj.Equals(arr.GetElement<object>(9)));
        }
        else
        {
            AssertTrue(obj == arr.GetElement<object>(4));
            AssertTrue(obj == arr.GetElement<object>(9));
        }

        // Remember, struct array doesn't have null element
        // (instead always initialized to default struct)
        if (!isStruct)
        {
            AssertTrue(null == arr.GetElement<object>(0));
        }
    }

    private static void ExecuteCacheApi(Type type)
    {
        var range = Enumerable.Range(0, 10).ToList();

        // Let's cache the getter for InstanceCount
        StaticAttributeGetter count = type.DelegateForGetStaticField("InstanceCount");

        // Now cache the 2-arg constructor of Person and playaround with the delegate returned
        int currentInstanceCount = (int)count();
        ConstructorInvoker ctor = type.DelegateForConstruct(new[] { typeof(int), typeof(string) });
        range.ForEach(i =>
        {
            object obj = ctor(i, "_" + i).CreateHolderIfValueType();
            AssertTrue(++currentInstanceCount == (int)count());
            AssertTrue(i == obj.GetField<int>("id"));
            AssertTrue("_" + i == obj.GetProperty<string>("Name"));
        });

        // Whatever thing we can do with the normal API, we can do with the cache API.
        // For example:
        AttributeSetter nameSetter = type.DelegateForSetProperty("Name");
        AttributeGetter nameGetter = type.DelegateForGetProperty("Name");

        object person = ctor(1, "Buu").CreateHolderIfValueType();
        AssertTrue("Buu" == nameGetter(person));
        nameSetter(person, "Doe");
        AssertTrue("Doe" == nameGetter(person));

        // Another example
        person = type.Construct().CreateHolderIfValueType();
        MethodInvoker walk = type.DelegateForInvoke("Walk", new[] { typeof(int) });
        range.ForEach(i => walk(person, i));
        AssertTrue(range.Sum() == person.GetField<int>("milesTraveled"));
    }

    public static void AssertTrue(bool expression)
    {
        if (!expression)
            throw new Exception("Not true");
        Console.WriteLine("Ok!");
    }
}
  • Share/Bookmark

Combres – WebForm & MVC Client-side Resource Combine Library

November 4th, 2009 Buu Nguyen No comments

Combres (i.e. Combine-Resources), is a very easy-to-use library which can be used to automate many steps that you would have to do yourself when applying many performance optimization techniques in your MVC and Web Form ASP.NET applications. This library is formerly known as ASP.NET MVC Client-side Resource Combine Library until I decided to retire that boring and lengthy name. Combres is also a major upgraded over the previous version. In a nutshell, the following features are supported by Combres:

  • Organize resource files, including JavaScript and CSS, into separate resource sets, each may share the same or use different configuration settings.
    • ConfigConfiguration settings are specified in an XML file which is monitored by Combres so that changes get noticed and applied immediately.
    • Resource files can be static files in the web server, dynamically generated files, or remote files from external servers or web applications.
  • Allow files in resource sets to be combined, minified, and gzipped before sending to browser. All is done using 1 single HTTP request per resource set. (Refer to Yslow’s performance rules #1, #4 and #10 to know why this is useful.)
    • The minification part is performed by the great YUI Compressor library.
  • Generate proper ETag and Expires/Cache-Control headers for every response as well as support server-side caching. (Refer to Yslow’s performance rules #3 and #13 to know why this is useful.)
  • Integrated with ASP.NET routing engine and thus work equally well for both ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET WebForm applications.
  • Support Debugging mode, which won’t cache or minify contents at all to facilitate debugging.
  • Extensibility via the filtering architecture. Anyone can easily add more functionality to the Combres engine by writing a custom filter. There are 2 built-in filters in the 1.0 beta release, which I will describe in this article.

I wrote about how to use and enhance this library in this Code Project article.

You can also get the binary, source code and sample from these links:

  • Share/Bookmark

ASP.NET MVC Validation Library

February 10th, 2009 Buu Nguyen 5 comments

Inspired by the work of Emad Ibrahim, I set out to develop a validation library for ASP.NET MVC. Besides trying to meet the same objectives as Emad Ibrahim’s library, i.e. model-based validation, integration with the jQuery validation plugin, and little or no duplication between client-side and server-side validation, these are the differences of my library:

  • Built for MS Validation Application Block. (Emad Ibrahim’s library targets Castle’s validation framework. Check out his library if you need this feature.)
  • Allow users to specify the properties to be included in a server-side validation. This is useful in situation in which you use part of the model in some pages (e.g. Change Password page only uses the Password field of the User entity).
  • Allow users to tell the client-side code generator to generate script to ignore missing DOM elements. This feature goes nicely with the above feature. The generator could have been implemented to receive a list of properties to generate client script for but I have not made up my mind yet whether this is a better approach or not.
  • Allow users to specify whether they want the validation initialization code to be generated or not. This is particular useful if you want to customize the validation initialization code differently for different pages.

How does it work?
The idea of the library is that one should be able to decorate an entity object with some validation attributes and then have that entity validated at both the server-side and client-side with the minimum amount of code. Let’s say you have a User entity in your application, you can annotate it as follows:

public class User
{
     [NotNullOrEmptyValidator(MessageTemplate = "Name is required")]
     [StringLengthValidator(6, 20, MessageTemplate = "Name must be between {3} and {5}")]
     public string Name { get; set; }

     [NotNullOrEmptyValidator(MessageTemplate = "Email is required")]
     [EmailValidator(MessageTemplate = "Invalid email address")]
     public string Email { get; set; }

     [NotNullOrEmptyValidator(MessageTemplate = "Location is required")]
     public string Location { get; set; }

     [NotNullOrEmptyValidator(MessageTemplate = "Password is required")]
     [StringLengthValidator(6, 50, MessageTemplate = "Password must be between {3} and {5}")]
     public string Password { get; set; }
}

Now, whenever this entity is populated with form posted values, you can perform server-side validation by invoking the Validate() extension method on the entity. Let’s do that in the action method.

[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult EditUser([Bind(Prefix="")]User user)
{
     try
     {
          user.Validate<User>();
     }
     catch (EntityValidationException ex)
     {
          ViewData.ModelState.PopulateWithErrors(ex);
     }
     return View();
}

The above code will perform validation on the entity given its validation attributes. If there’s any validation error, an EntityValidationException object is thrown and you can use it the populate the model state with error messages. The method PopulateWithErrors is another extension method provided by the library.

If you want to limit the properties to be validated (e.g. in a password change scenario), you can pass an array of property names into the Validate() method.

[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult ChangePassword([Bind(Prefix="")]User user)
{
     try
     {
          // Only validate the password property
          user.Validate<User>(new[] {"password"});
     }
     catch (EntityValidationException ex)
     {
          ViewData.ModelState.PopulateWithErrors(ex);
     }
     return View();
}

I could have added a custom model binder to the library so that validation happens at the model binding phase but I think that’s not a flexible approach since in many cases we would want to perform validation in the service layer instead so that the validation takes place consistently for any client of the service.

Let’s see the result of the server-side validation:

Okay, let’s move to client-side validation. The trick behind the client-side validation is that the view will invokes the HtmlHelper’s ClientSideValidation() extension method which will retrieve all validation attributes of the specified entity type (e.g. User) and generate equivalent client-side validation script for them.

Currently, while you can apply as many validation attributes to an entity as you like and the server-side validation will work perfectly fine, only a couple of validation rules are supported by the client-side code generator, namely required field validation, string length validation, and email validation. These3 rules are sufficient for my current need and I will add more on a needed basis (or you can download the code and implement more rules yourself.)

There are a couple of overloads of the ClientSideValidation() method:

// Generates validation script for the User type
Html.ClientSideValidation<User>();

// Generates validation script for the User type, including the code to initialize form validation
Html.ClientSideValidation<User>(string formName);

// Generates validation script for the User type and adds necessary code to avoid JavaScript error if one or
// more properties in the User type do not match with any DOM element.
Html.ClientSideValidation<User>(bool ignoreMissingElements);

// See the above 2 overloads
Html.ClientSideValidation<User>(string formName, bool ignoreMissingElements);

For example, the generated code for an invocation of the second overload will result in the following code:

<script language="JavaScript"><!--
$().ready(function() {

$("#edit-user-form").validate();
$("#name").rules("add", {
	minlength : "6", maxlength : "20",
	required : true,
	messages: {
		minlength : "Name must be between 6 and 20", maxlength : "Name must be between 6 and 20",
		required : "Name is required"

	}
});

$("#email").rules("add", {
	required : true,
	email : true,
	messages: {
		required : "Email is required",
		email : "Invalid email address"
	}
});

$("#location").rules("add", {
	required : true,
	messages: {
		required : "Location is required"

	}
});

$("#password").rules("add", {
	minlength : "6", maxlength : "50",
	required : true,
	messages: {
		minlength : "Password must be between 6 and 50", maxlength : "Password must be between 6 and 50",
		required : "Password is required"
	}
});

});
--></script>

That’s it, you don’t need to write a single line of JavaScript to have this nice client-side validation:

How can I download and use it?
The library is hosted at CodePlex. I have built it with ASP.NET MVC Beta, Enterprise Library 4.1, jQuery 1.2, and jQuery validation plug-in 1.5. You might need to make a couple of changes if you want it to work with a different version of those libraries. Any bug, please post on the project page instead of posting here. Thanks & hope you’ll find the library useful.

  • Share/Bookmark